Why the US and Iran are betting on Pakistan to stop a total war

Why the US and Iran are betting on Pakistan to stop a total war

Can Islamabad actually pull off the impossible? It's the question everyone's asking as rumors swirl about a high-stakes sequel to last week’s failed negotiations. After a marathon 21-hour session at the Serena Hotel ended in a stalemate on April 12, the world held its breath. Now, despite the fallout and the newly imposed U.S. naval blockade, both Washington and Tehran seem to be looking back at Pakistan as their only viable exit ramp.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt basically confirmed it on Wednesday. She called Pakistan the "only mediator" in this mess. It’s a wild turn of events considering how close we are to the edge. The current two-week ceasefire expires on April 22, and if there isn't a breakthrough in Islamabad by then, the "Operation Epic Fury" strikes might look like a warm-up. Also making news in related news: The Silence of the Situation Room and the Long Road to Islamabad.

Why Pakistan is the only one left at the table

You'd think a major European power or a Gulf state would be leading this. But they aren't. Pakistan has managed to wedge itself into a unique position. It shares a border with Iran and a complicated, decades-long military relationship with the U.S.

Pakistan has a massive Shi'ite population—the second largest in the world—which gives it some cultural skin in the game that other mediators lack. Plus, Islamabad is terrified of what happens if Iran fully collapses. A total breakdown of authority in the Iranian province of Sistan-Baluchistan would bleed directly into Pakistan’s own volatile border regions. They aren't just being nice; they’re trying to prevent a regional wildfire from burning their own house down. Further information regarding the matter are explored by BBC News.

What went wrong during the first round

Last week’s talks weren't exactly a friendly chat. Vice President JD Vance led the American side, accompanied by Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff. On the other side of the table sat Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi and Parliament Speaker Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf.

The primary friction points are massive. Iran wants its frozen assets released and an end to Israeli strikes in Lebanon. The U.S. is demanding an immediate end to Iran's nuclear enrichment and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz without those controversial "tolls" Iran started charging.

  • The Nuclear Sticking Point: Iran has about 1,000 pounds of enriched uranium. They aren't giving it up.
  • The Hormuz Tolls: Tehran thinks they've found a "third source of income" by charging ships to pass. Trump calls it piracy.
  • The Blockade: Since the talks failed, Trump took to Truth Social to announce a blockade on any ship paying those tolls.

It’s a classic case of neither side wanting to look weak. Vance basically told reporters he went there to accept a surrender, not to negotiate. That’s not exactly how you get a deal done with a regime that feels its survival is on the line.

The 45 day window and the ticking clock

The proposal on the table, pushed heavily by Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Asim Munir, is a two-phase framework. Phase one is the current shaky ceasefire. Phase two is a 45-day window for "permanent settlement" talks.

The problem is that the "Phase 1" ceasefire is about to run out. Trump has already threatened to blast Iranian power plants and bridges "into the Stone Age" if the Strait isn't cleared. Meanwhile, the IRGC (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) is calling the U.S. demands a "ridiculous spectacle."

There's a lot of talk about a "15-point proposal" that includes sanctions relief. But for that to work, Iran has to stop its missile program and its support for regional proxies. In the eyes of the IRGC, that’s basically asking them to disarm while their enemies are still at the gates.

What you should watch for next week

If the delegations return to Islamabad, look at who is actually in the room. Last time, the Pakistani team spent 21 hours shuttling between rooms because the two sides wouldn't even look at each other for the first few hours.

Watch the oil prices. They’re already spiking because of the blockade. If the global economy starts to slide, the pressure on Washington to make a "bad" deal might increase. On the flip side, if the Iranian economy—already battered by internal protests and Israeli strikes—reaches a breaking point, Tehran might actually blink.

Don't expect a grand peace treaty. That's not happening. The best-case scenario is an extension of the ceasefire and a temporary "freeze-for-freeze" agreement. Iran stops enriching; the U.S. pauses the blockade. It’s a thin hope, but in April 2026, it’s the only hope we’ve got.

Your Move

  • Monitor the Strait: Any report of a ship being seized or "blocked" by the U.S. Navy will likely tank the next round of talks before they start.
  • Watch the April 22 Deadline: If no meeting is scheduled by the 20th, the ceasefire is effectively dead.
  • Track Oil Futures: Energy markets are the most honest indicator of whether the "smart money" thinks peace is possible.
TC

Thomas Cook

Driven by a commitment to quality journalism, Thomas Cook delivers well-researched, balanced reporting on today's most pressing topics.